After Pahalgam: Evaluating India's Military Response Options in 2025

Indian Rafale Fighter Jet
Indian Rafale Fighter Jet

The Pahalgam Attack and Rising Tensions

On April 22, 2025, a gruesome terrorist attack shook the serene town of Pahalgam in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir. A group of heavily armed terrorists conducted a deadly carnage, killing 26 civilians and injuring dozens more. The attack, reminiscent of the 2019 Pulwama suicide bombing, once again brought the Indo-Pakistan conflict to the forefront of South Asian geopolitics.

Preliminary investigations by Indian security agencies attributed the attack to Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), a Pakistan-based terror outfit with a long history of orchestrating cross-border attacks. This incident, unfolding against the backdrop of Pakistan's ongoing internal instability and increasing Chinese assertiveness along India’s northern borders, has prompted the Indian government to contemplate a decisive military response, similar to the Balakot airstrikes that followed Pulwama.

However, the strategic calculus of 2025 is significantly more complex than that of 2019. India’s military capabilities have evolved, new doctrines have been introduced, and the geopolitical dynamics in the Indo-Pacific and South Asian theatres have undergone profound transformations. In this context, it becomes imperative to assess what military options India possesses today, how they compare to the Balakot model of 2019, and what potential outcomes and escalatory ladders lie ahead.

Comparing 2019 and 2025: The Strategic Context

1. The 2019 Balakot Precedent

In February 2019, the Indian Air Force conducted precision airstrikes on Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) training camps in Balakot, Pakistan, in retaliation for the Pulwama suicide bombing that killed 40 CRPF personnel. The Balakot strikes marked a major doctrinal shift, as India broke from its self-imposed restraint and targeted terrorist infrastructure inside sovereign Pakistani territory.

Pakistan responded with an aerial intrusion that resulted in it losing its F-16 fighter jet and an Indian MiG-21 Bison being shot down. The Indian pilot, Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman, was captured and later returned by Pakistan, avoiding a wider escalation. The episode, while showcasing India’s new assertiveness, also highlighted the risks of engaging a nuclear-armed adversary.

2. The Military Landscape in 2025

Fast forward to 2025, India has undertaken a massive modernization drive:

Air Power Enhancement: The Indian Air Force has fully inducted two squadrons of Rafale fighter jets with advanced electronic warfare suites, precision-guided munitions, and Meteor Beyond Visual Range Air to Air Missiles (BVRAAMs). Indigenous fighter production has also surged, with the Tejas Mk2 entering operational service. This gives India a qualitative edge in precision strike capabilities.

Integrated Theatre Commands: India has operationalized its first Integrated Theatre Command (Northern Theatre), unifying resources across the Army, Air Force, and Navy. This enhances coordination, logistical synergy, and response time for cross-domain operations.

Missile Advancements: The Pralay quasi-ballistic missile, capable of high-speed, high-accuracy strikes within a range of 150 to 500 km, has entered service. Coupled with BrahMos and the Shourya missile systems, India now possesses a formidable standoff strike arsenal.

Air Defence Systems: The indigenous Akash and imported S-400 Triumf systems now provide a multi-layered air defense shield along India’s western borders. The induction of the Akashteer system has also enabled integrated low-level airspace control during combat.

Cyber and Space Capabilities: India’s Defence Cyber Agency and Defence Space Agency have matured, enabling cyber-offensive operations and real-time satellite intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR).

This transformation marks a quantum leap from India’s 2019 military posture.

Current Geopolitical Factors Influencing Military Options

1. Pakistan’s Fragile Internal Situation

Pakistan in 2025 faces severe economic distress, social unrest, and political instability. IMF bailouts have failed to arrest inflation, and the Army's internal cohesion has been strained by growing civil-military tensions. This limits Pakistan’s appetite for sustained military conflict, although it does not rule out escalatory retaliation.

2. China’s Shadow

With the Line of Actual Control (LAC) remaining tense, China remains a significant factor in Indian strategic planning. Any major operation against Pakistan must consider the potential for Chinese opportunism in the eastern sector.

3. International Stakeholders

While India enjoys improved relations with Western powers, especially under QUAD (India, Australia, Japan, and the United States) and I2U2 (India, Israel, UAE, USA) frameworks, there is also greater scrutiny. Any military operation must be calibrated to avoid global censure while maintaining strategic credibility.

India’s Military Response Options in 2025

Given the current realities, India has a range of military options, categorized by intensity and risk:

Option 1: Covert Special Forces Operations

India’s elite Para Special Forces (SFs) and MARCOS (Marine Commandos) units can be deployed for trans-LoC and cross-border raids to eliminate specific terrorist targets.

  • Pros: Low signature, deniable, avoids large-scale escalation.

  • Cons: High operational risk, limited strategic messaging.

  • Best Use Case: Targeting high-value terrorist leadership in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (PoK) or Punjab.

Option 2: Precision Airstrikes (Balakot Plus)

Utilizing Rafales, Tejas Mk2, and UAVs to conduct stand-off strikes using glide bombs and Precision Guided Munitions (PGMs) on terror camps in PoK or even deeper.

  • Pros: Demonstrates resolve; precision limits collateral damage; can be conducted with minimal violation of Pakistani airspace.

  • Cons: Risk of escalation, retaliatory airstrikes by Pakistan Air Force (PAF).

  • Best Use Case: Destroying camps in Muzaffarabad, Balakot, Mansehra.

Option 3: Tactical Ballistic Missile Strikes (Pralay Doctrine)

Using the Pralay missile system to destroy fortified terrorist infrastructure, ammunition dumps, or ISI control centers.

  • Pros: No need for aircraft penetration; high precision; excellent for psychological impact.

  • Cons: Harder to calibrate diplomatically; can provoke retaliatory missile launches.

  • Best Use Case: One-off punitive strike with strategic messaging.

Option 4: Cyber Offensive Operations

Disrupting Pakistan’s military command and control, power grids in border provinces, or ISI communications.

  • Pros: No kinetic footprint; can precede physical strikes; low attribution.

  • Cons: Limited immediate visibility; potential civilian fallout.

  • Best Use Case: As part of a hybrid doctrine with kinetic options.

Option 5: Artillery Dominance along the LoC

Sustained Bofors and Pinaka Multi-Barrel Rocket Launcher (MBRL) shelling on launch pads and infiltration routes across LoC.

  • Pros: Immediate; punishes tactical enablers; keeps LOC active.

  • Cons: Civilian casualties possible; potential for war of attrition.

  • Best Use Case: In conjunction with infiltration interdiction.

Option 6: Naval Posturing and Maritime Embargo

Deploying the Indian Navy’s Western Command to blockade Karachi port or intercept Pakistan’s commercial shipping.

  • Pros: Strategic signaling; affects Pakistan’s economy.

  • Cons: High escalation risk; affects neutral shipping.

  • Best Use Case: As part of total-spectrum escalation strategy.

Pakistan’s Possible Response Scenarios

Pakistan’s response spectrum ranges from denial and diplomatic counter-accusation to full military retaliation, as seen in 2019. However, a few changes have occurred:

  • Air deterrence: After Balakot, PAF upgraded its F-16s and JF-17 Thunder fleets with new avionics and standoff weapons. But fuel and operational tempo constraints remain.

  • Proxy surge: Instead of direct confrontation, Pakistan may unleash a new wave of proxy infiltration, Improvised Explosive Device (IED) attacks, or communal destabilization in Kashmir and beyond.

  • China card: There is a possibility of China mobilizing People's Liberation Army (PLA) units along Lineof Actual Control (LAC) to exert psychological pressure.

However, Pakistan’s economic and political fragility, as well as Financial Action Task Force (FATF) pressure (despite grey list removal), limits its risk appetite.

Escalatory Ladder: Risks and Restraints

Any military operation must be calibrated against potential Pakistani responses:

Level 1: Diplomatic protest, LoC skirmishes.

Level 2: PAF airstrikes on Indian military bases.

Level 3: Missile exchange or mass mobilization.

Level 4: Full-scale war under nuclear overhang.

India’s superiority in conventional forces gives it an edge in Level 1 and 2 scenarios, but beyond Level 3, the risk of nuclear miscalculation becomes significant. Hence, measured escalation with strong backchannel diplomacy remains essential.

Conclusion: A Test of India's Strategic Maturity

The Pahalgam terror attack is a direct challenge to India's deterrence credibility. With significantly enhanced military capabilities, India has multiple options to punish the perpetrators and their patrons. Yet, each option carries strategic risks that must be weighed against geopolitical realities.

Unlike in 2019, India in 2025 stands as a more confident regional power, with stronger military integration, better technology, and global diplomatic leverage. The response to Pahalgam must reflect not just military might, but strategic wisdom.

A calibrated, integrated retaliation that delivers both tactical damage and strategic deterrence, while avoiding uncontrolled escalation, would signal India's emergence as a mature military power capable of defending its interests without destabilizing the region.

Indian Rafale Fighter Jet